Contract Drafting Tips - Arbitration Clauses in Construction Contracts

» Articles » Construction Articles » Article

June 19, 2007


Because construction projects can be so complex, and it is likely that the subject matter will be beyond the realm of experience of most laypersons who may sit on a jury, the construction industry has a long tradition of providing, in contracts, for disputes to be resolved through arbitration proceedings.

If you choose arbitration, consider these issues in drafting such a provision, regardless of whether you are an owner or even a general contractor:

  • Should you use a neutral service provider, such as the American Arbitration Association (“AAA”), which has published procedural rules and an established roster of neutrals?
  • Do you want to provide for mediation as a condition precedent to arbitration?
  • Do you want all disputes to go to arbitration?
  • Will discovery (i.e. depositions, interrogatories and document review) be allowed?
  • How will the arbitrators be selected, what are their qualifications and how many will there be?
  • What, if any, rules of evidence will apply?
  • Can other parties be joined?
  • May the arbitrator award attorneys’ fees and/or the cost of the arbitration to the prevailing party?
  • Will the arbitration be confidential?
  • Will the award of the arbitrator be “binding and final” or subject to appeal and judicial review and, if so, on what grounds?

In drafting arbitration clauses on a construction project, the owner should take care that the clause in the owner-architect, owner-engineer, owner-general contractor and owner-construction manager contracts each provide that all parties may be brought into one proceeding. Otherwise, the owner may find itself in multiple proceedings with the attendant extra costs and fees and the risk of inconsistent results.

Another approach is to draft the arbitration clause to provide that the drafter of the clause – be it an owner or a general contractor – has the right to elect to proceed either in court or in arbitration.  This provides the flexibility of deciding which venue is appropriate for the particular dispute. 

Continue reading below

FREE Construction Training from Lorman

Lorman has over 38 years of professional training experience.
Join us for a special white paper and level up your Construction knowledge!

Best Practices for Measuring and Documenting Construction Delays

Learn More

Before including such a clause providing the authority to elect between arbitration and court, the law of the state where the project is located should be reviewed. A few states have held that such clauses are unenforceable as they lack mutuality of consideration. Most states allow them in commercial contracts.


The material appearing in this web site is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Transmission of this information is not intended to create, and receipt does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. The information provided herein is intended only as general information which may or may not reflect the most current developments. Although these materials may be prepared by professionals, they should not be used as a substitute for professional services. If legal or other professional advice is required, the services of a professional should be sought.

The opinions or viewpoints expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Lorman Education Services. All materials and content were prepared by persons and/or entities other than Lorman Education Services, and said other persons and/or entities are solely responsible for their content.

Any links to other web sites are not intended to be referrals or endorsements of these sites. The links provided are maintained by the respective organizations, and they are solely responsible for the content of their own sites.